The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The court below rejected the plaintiff's assertion on the premise that the defendant is liable to pay insurance money to D in relation to the property damage suffered by the plaintiff in relation to the property damage caused by the fire in this case occurred from movable assets located outside of the building of F-factory operated by D, for which the defendant fully fulfilled his duty to explain the subject of the special agreement on the liability for fire against fire and the terms and conditions of exemption among the insurance contracts in this case.

The judgment below

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the duty to explain the terms and conditions or in violation of the rules of evidence.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.