The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) is limited to the fact that the defendant left the cell phone store operated by the defendant, and only the defendant satisfe the defendant's chest and sound the victim, and there was no assault by the victim's chest, such as the facts stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim made a concrete and consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the victim was able to borrow money to the defendant, and the defendant was able to take her chest over the floor by her hand,” ② The witness G also made a consistent statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that “the defendant was able to take the victim’s bath at the victim’s end and her breast by hand, and the victim was her chest over the rear.” The witness of the court below also corresponds to the contents of the above victim’s statement. ③ The witness of the court below first stated that the victim was her hand, and the victim was her chest, and then the victim was her finger, and the victim was her hand over, and the victim was her hand over, and the content of the crime of this case was not consistent with the victim’s statement at the time of the court below’s oral testimony.