logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.06.26 2020고정62
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the age of 37) are legal couple, or they are separated from November 16, 2019.

1. On December 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40 on December 2, 2019, the Defendant: (b) found the Defendant at a school of his child E (n, 7 years old; (c) and asked his child E (n, 7 years old; (d) whether the Defendant’s house password was changed; (c) was changed; and (d) did not attend the instant netization and laid off the street trop and pens on the wooden table on the floor of the living room on the ground that he was asked by the victim, and continued to cut the tree table.

Accordingly, the defendant stated 1.5 million won in the bill of indictment in the city, but according to the data submitted by the defendant, the purchase price of the Nowon-gu in this case is 80,000 won.

Even if the market price of the Nowon-do in this case is recognized differently from the written indictment, it does not substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his right to defense.

Considering that a considerable amount of patriarcha caused damage to the patriarcha, the effectiveness of the damage has been impaired.

2. The injured Defendant, like the date and time stated in Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 1 at a place, had a knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, knee, knee, and tension in detail, which require 14-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the crime of causing property damage is not established since the North Korea of this case is owned independently by the defendant.

In full view of the following facts and circumstances revealed in the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the defendant's income.

arrow