1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the defendant C and Multi-child Industry is modified as follows.

1. The reasons why the court stated this part of the underlying facts are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, if it excludes the following parts, and thus cites it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

제1심판결 제5면 제4행부터 제5행까지의 “별지 감정보완도2 표시 나, A, B, C, D, E 부분을 임차하여 사용하였고” 부분을 “[별지 1] ’감정보완도2‘ 및 [별지 2] ’감정보완도2 일부확대도면‘ 표시 나, A, B, C-2, D, E 부분을 임차하여 사용하였고[위 각 도면 표시 C 부분 중 ’㉠, ⓖ, 73, 74, 69, ⓗ, ⓘ, ⓙ, ㉠의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 부분 약 39.3㎡‘를 ’C-1'로 표시하고(종전 C 부분 중 좌측 부분), 나머지인 ‘ⓩ, ⓨ, ⓔ, ⓕ, ㉠, ⓩ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 부분 약 19.6㎡’를 ‘C-2'로 각 표시한다(종전 C 부분 중 우측 부분)]”로 고쳐 쓴다.

In Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance, "attached Form 2..............." in Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance shall be as follows: "attached Form 1........................................."

2. Determination as to a claim for return of unjust enrichment: The reasons why the court should describe this part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the revocation and ex officio correction are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following are written. As such, this part shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] On the 8th judgment of the court of first instance, the corresponding part of the "right to claim the return of unjust enrichment against the defendant C and the dispute resolution committee of the conflict of interest industry" was added as follows.

"2) The portion of the claim for the return of unjust enrichment against Defendant C and the LAS Co., Ltd. (the possession of most of the statutory provisions, and the possession of some of the items lacking the certification of possession, is in fact controlled by any person in light of social norms.