logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.08 2017나19366
부당이득금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

3...

Reasons

The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be judged together.

1. The reasons why this Court shall state in this part of the underlying facts are excluded from the following parts, and the reasons why this Court excludes the following parts of the reasoning of the first instance judgment, are the same as the part of the “1. Recognizing the facts of recognition” from No. 9 to No. 17, under the grounds of the first instance judgment. As such, this shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of

[Supplementary part] From the fifth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the Defendant Frebuilding Housing Association (hereinafter “Defendant Frebuilding Housing Association”) was used as “Co-Defendant Frebuilding Housing Association in the first instance trial (hereinafter “the instant association”)” and all of the following “Defendant Frebuilding Housing Association” were used as “the instant association.”

From the fifth side of the judgment of the first instance, the company of the second instance was used by converting the “Defendant Company” into “Defendant”, and all of the “Defendant Company” below was put into “Defendant”.

On the 10th page of the judgment of the first instance, the part "... the holding of an extraordinary general meeting for drawing lots of the same apartment house of this case" shall be followed as follows.

f. 1) The instant association held an extraordinary general meeting on December 23, 2007.

At the time, 79 members of the association of this case were present.

At the meeting on December 23, 2007, the members discussed how to draw the same level of water, such as how to draw by deducting the first and second floors from the extraordinary general meeting of December 23, 2007, but did not reach the resolution, but decided to hold the extraordinary meeting again one week after completing the meeting.

2. Accordingly, on December 30, 2007, the instant association held an extraordinary general meeting again on the agenda of the items as indicated below.

At the beginning of the meeting, 78 members of the union of this case were present at the meeting, and one of the 81 members was present at the meeting.

Members attending the meeting are members who wish not to apply for a flat sentence at the extraordinary general meeting on December 30, 2007.

arrow