A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court on August 17, 2011, and the above judgment was finalized on October 8, 201.

【Criminal facts】 The Defendant, around October 20, 2010, intended to arrange the employment of the victims E in DDa located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to offer money for job placement in return for employment intermediation.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, all of the money received from the injured party was thought to be used as the operating expenses of the company, and even if the injured party received the money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to employ the injured party's children to the large enterprise

The Defendant received 10 million won from the injured party to the F account in the name of the Defendant’s mother on the same day, and acquired 60 million won in total through 11 times from around that time to Haman on February 2011, as shown in the attached crime list, from around 201, the Defendant acquired 60,000 won in total and 1.5 million won in gift certificates from the injured party, as shown in the attached crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in G;

1. Statement of the E police statement;

1. Details of passbook transactions, applications for transactions, details of transactions, and detailed statements of each transaction;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (report on the final date of judgment);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment (in comprehensive, the choice of imprisonment);

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the treatment of concurrent crimes, provided that the sentencing guidelines do not apply to the concurrent crimes of Article 39(1) after Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the reasons for sentencing.

The crime of this case is committed by using the strong mind of the victim that the defendant would have been employed by his own consciousness to allow the defendant to work for the children of the victim.

The nature of the crime is very poor, and the amount of damage of the crime of this case is relatively large, by deceiving the victim and receiving money and valuables over ten times from the victim.

5 years from the time of the instant crime.