1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The following facts can be found as follows: Gap evidence Nos. 10 and 11 may be incorporated into the whole purport of the pleading.

Around August 22, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 on the charge that the Defendant insulting the Plaintiff at the front of the Youngdong-gu 1046-2 Youngdong-dong 1046-2, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, on May 23, 2012, and around 00:35, a summary order of KRW 500,00 was issued, and the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.

B. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 to the Plaintiff on the criminal facts that the Defendant publicly insultingd the Plaintiff at a place where a large number of unspecified people traveling from the taxi platform of Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 1010-7, the taxi engineer of Suwon-si, and the taxi platform of KRW 1010 to 10:30 on July 1, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 70,000, and the said summary order became final and conclusive at that time.

(2) According to the reasoning of the court below's judgment on February 2, 200, the defendant committed a tort against the plaintiff as to each of the insults of this case, and it can be acknowledged in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered a considerable mental suffering. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff's mental suffering in money. Considering the circumstances leading up to the insults of this case, the specific contents of each of the insults of this case, the other party, and other various circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, the amount of consolation money shall be set at KRW 300,000, since it is reasonable to determine the consolation money amount to KRW 300,000, and each of the insults of this case was committed against the plaintiff as to the insults of this case.