logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.25 2018나30809
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim added by this court is dismissed.

3. Appeal expenses and interest.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 2013, the Plaintiff attended a computer program course operated at the National Institute of Computer in Seocho-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”) at the National Institute (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”).

B. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant, who had been an employee of the instant driving school, committed an assault against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant assault”) by following the following methods: (a) while having talked with the Defendant on September 13, 2013; (b) having engaged in an interview with the Defendant; (c) having frightening the Plaintiff’s bridges; (d) cutting down the clothes on the bridges; and (e) cutting down

C. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,00 with the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013 High Court Decision 27194, supra, on the criminal facts of the instant assault, and the said summary order was finalized on January 7, 2014.

On September 9, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that D’s employees of the instant driving school jointly with the Defendant at the time of the instant assault, and filed a complaint with the investigative agency as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) against D. However, the prosecutor of the Seoul East District Prosecutors’ Office issued a non-prosecution disposition on December 21, 2016 on the ground that D was guilty of having no suspicion (Evidence of Evidence).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff suffered bodily injury due to the assault in this case, and did not complete the programming curriculum of the private teaching institute in this case with mental or physical pain. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff is obligated to pay 3,257,380 won for medical expenses incurred from bodily injury and 5,500,000 won for consolation money.

B. According to each description of evidence Nos. 2, and evidence No. 7-1 of the Plaintiff’s injury caused by the Defendant’s assault, the determination of the medical expenses claim is based on the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s satisfination, satisfination, satisf, and tensions, satisfinites, face satfinites, shoulders, shoulders, shoulders, and tensions of the Defendant’s assault; and (b) the Plaintiff’s medical treatment for two weeks.

arrow