1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is to add "J" to "I" after Part II of Part II of the Reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and the effect of the consent of the court of first instance is not effective, or subsequent to "the consent of the court of third" is limited to the use of the construction vehicle for the construction of a factory, and if the supplementary intervenor submitted it to the defendant as if he had obtained the consent of the use of the construction vehicle for the construction of the factory beyond its usage, or the supplementary intervenor submitted it to the defendant as if he had not obtained the consent of the construction of the road, or did not have "I or would have "I", and even if the supplementary intervenor did not have "I or would not have "I" of the 4th sentence," and even if the deceased died lawfully before the disposition of the change in the permission of the court of first instance, the consent of the court of first instance cannot be deemed to have been newly admitted to the inherited property of the court of first instance except for the plaintiff and the heir's new consent of the court of second instance."

If so, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.