All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable. The sentence of the lower court (a fine of KRW 5 million is imposed on Defendant A, Defendant B: a fine of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendants led to the confession of the instant crime and reflectiveness; the Defendants did not have any record of punishment for the same crime; the Defendants appears to have no much profit from the instant crime; the period of business operation is relatively short; and the Defendants’ economic situation appears to be insufficient.

B. However, the Defendants, however, run a business to arrange commercial sex acts closely through the Internet and mobile. The Defendants’ act of arranging commercial sex acts is not good, and the act of arranging commercial sex acts is highly harmful to society by commercializing women’s sex, such as impairing the sound sexual culture and good morals, and there is no special change of circumstances after the court below was sentenced, and other various circumstances, which form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, including the Defendants’ age, criminal background, and circumstances after the crime, are considered in light of the above circumstances favorable to the Defendants, the court below’ sentence is too unreasonable, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendants.

Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendants is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.