The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (in 6 months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant has set up a business place in the outer dog, equipped with beds and necessary office fixtures, and arranged the sexual traffic to employ women engaged in sexual traffic. The crime is not good, and the act of arranging sexual traffic is highly harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and impairing sound sexual culture and good morals, etc. The act of arranging sexual traffic is one time of suspended sentence for the same crime, the defendant has the record of being punished twice of a fine, and there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, are considered, and it is not deemed unfair since the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.