logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원서부지원 2020.03.26 2019가단107058
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant paid KRW 103,950,00 to the Plaintiff KRW 6% per annum from April 2, 2019 to March 26, 2020.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On July 3, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the supply of solar structures with respect to the production and installation of G (the following, the purpose of the contract is “instant construction” and the contract itself is “instant supply contract”.

2) Contract details: The payment date of KRW 547,700,000 (excluding value-added tax): July 23, 2018 (excluding value-added tax): Contract deposit (excluding value-added tax on September 30, 2018): KRW 164,100 for intermediate payment (20%) within three days after entering into the site of the structures at KRW 164,100,000 and within seven days after the completion of the inspection of installation of the 104,70,000 won for the remainder (10%) at KRW 54,70,000: the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the intermediate payment of KRW 10,000 within ten days after the completion of the inspection before the use of KRW 54,70,000; and

B. On July 26, 2018, the Defendant issued a notice to the Plaintiff on July 26, 2018, stating the proposal for the modification, and notified the Plaintiff of the detailed arrangement work and the confirmation of the design modification/cost of the structure. On July 27, 2018, the following day, the Defendant sent a revised arrangement map by re-checking the separation distance, and notified the Plaintiff of the need for each alteration of the rupture in order to meet

On August 7, 2018, the defendant sent the placement map to the plaintiff on August 7, 2018, notified that the 6nd/5nd of the additional structure became final and conclusive at 25th, and requested to proceed with the structural review by referring to this.

On August 30, 2018, the Defendant requested that the Plaintiff inform the Plaintiff of the draft of design data, structural calculations, and the detailed specifications of the structure, expected schedule, etc., and requested that the Plaintiff, on September 3, 2018, “In setting up the schedule for completion of construction by the time schedule for completion of construction after 2-3 days from the structural calculation, and the delivery schedule of the structure and the schedule for completion of construction after 2-3 days from the design examination, the agreement should proceed, and that the entire schedule of construction should be reduced to the maximum extent possible, and that the response to the structure and schedule by the next day.

The defendant, September 5, 2018, shall be the plaintiff, and the defendant shall be Eul, C, and D.

arrow