logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.01.09 2017고정574
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 17:45 on September 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a B B Poter truck and driven a point of 28.1km from the water source to the water surface of the two-lanes from the water source to the water surface of the two-lanes; (b) tried to change the two-lanes from the two-lanes to the three-lanes; (c) the Defendant tried to change the two-lanes from the two-lanes to the three-lanes of the passenger car driven by the victim C (27 years old); but (d) as the said Poter did not change the two-lanes, instead of returning the hand to the left-hand side, and failed to change the two-lanes, the Defendant, who is a dangerous article, driven by the Defendant, brought the cargo to drinking the victim by using the said Poter.

이에 피고인은 위 포터 화물차의 전조등을 깜빡이고 경적을 울리며 피해자 차량을 뒤따라와 차선을 변경하여 피해자 차량을 추월한 뒤 피해자 차량 앞에서 급정지하고, 피해자에게 “ 야, 이 새끼야, 운전 똑바로 해. ”라고 욕설을 하여 피해자의 생명 또는 신체에 어떠한 위해를 가할 듯한 태도를 보였다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with a dangerous object, which is a motor vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the cutting of a black boom;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283(1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, driven a motor vehicle and was driving a threat against the victim on the ground that the victim did not properly change the vehicle line.

As a retaliation for the crime of this case, it is necessary to strictly punish drivers of this case as it causes interference with traffic and may cause serious danger to the surrounding vehicle as well as the other driver of the vehicle.

However, the defendant is the case.

arrow