logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.09.07 2017고단2245
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year, and by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in the E Launa car, Defendant B is a person who is engaged in the operation of the F4.5 tons of cargo vehicles.

Defendant

A, around 10:45 on December 2, 2016, driving the above car, driving the oil in H station located in G in Gwangju Northern-gu, and trying to enter the three-lanes of the above Part I into the three-lanes. Defendant B driving the above cargo vehicle on the same day at the same time, driving the above cargo vehicle on the same day, and driving the three-lanes in front of the above H station at the h station in Gwangju, and driving the three-lanes of the above H station at the two-lanes of the front of the oil station in Gwangju.

At this point, since there is a road with a speed of 80km without a signal, Defendant A has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving a vehicle, such as whether there is no vehicle from entering the road, whether it does not interfere with the flow of the road due to the entry of Defendant A’s vehicle into the road, and whether it does not interfere with the flow of the road due to the operation of direction at the time of entering the road. Defendant B had a duty of care to prevent accidents by operating the vehicle by operating the direction when changing the vehicle. Defendant B had a duty of care to prevent accidents by operating the vehicle by operating the direction when changing the vehicle, etc.

Nevertheless, Defendant A neglected this and entered the three-lanes of the road as soon as possible without viewing that Defendant B’s freight cars enter the three-lanes, without operating the left-hand direction direction, and Defendant B neglected this as well as Defendant B’s negligent entering the three-lanes of the moving direction from a 50 to 80-meter turning point, and without operating the brake system, Defendant A’s vehicle entered the two-lanes of the moving direction, due to the negligence of not operating the left-hand direction, etc. in order to avoid drilling, but changing the left-hand turn line to the left-hand side.

J Driving car has been driven in one lane in the direction of proceeding by allowing the K-learning car to change its lane into one lane.

There is a conflict between L's L's M's L's L's L's L's L's M's freight vehicles,

arrow