A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was urged to return home from E, belonging to the Police Station D branch of the Police Station D branch of Ansan-gu Police Station D, Ansan-gu, where he received a 112 report in front of the convenience store located in Syang-gu, Syang-si B, and sent to the site on May 27, 2017; and (b) took a bath to “Seman feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb feb f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of CCTV image photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendations given in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (fe.g., interference with performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (fe., June 1 to June) of Article 1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties / The extent of assault is not easy. - Unfavorable circumstances: The degree of assault is not easy. - The defendant is recognized as committing a crime, and there is no criminal conviction or imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment.