logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.11.17 2016고정549
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is a person who operates a “F restaurant” in the Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Y, the defendant A is a person who operates the “H” in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Y, and the defendant B is a person who operates the “J farm” in the Dong-gu, west-gu, Y, Y, and the slaughter and disposal of livestock should be done at the permitted workplace.

Defendant

B around 09:00 on February 22, 2016, at approximately 09:00, confirmed 1 1 mari from the bones of the bridge at “J farm”, and requested D to slaughter the spawn by linking the spawn with the above spawn by identifying the spawn. D loaned the place, tool, etc. so that the spawn may slaughter the spawn by contact with the Defendant A. Accordingly, at around 11:00 on the same day, the Defendant A sent the spawn from the vehicle with the spawn at the spawn of the spawn of the spawn and carried the spawn at the above spawn, and at around 11:00 on the same day, D removed the spawn of the spawn from the spawn of the spawn and removed the spawn from the bones.

As a result, Defendants conspired to slaughter and dispose of livestock at a place other than the permitted workplace.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. Application of the video Acts and subordinate statutes to the violating site photographs;

1. The Defendants who are subject to applicable provisions on criminal facts and who are subject to punishment: Articles 45 (1) 1 and 7 (1) (main sentence) of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment provided that Defendant B shall illegally slaughter to Defendant D, and the degree of participation in the crime is difficult to view that Defendant A’s provision of a slaughter place and sale of some of them, etc. In addition, Defendant A was punished eight times (two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment and six times a fine) due to the crime of this type.

arrow