1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the statement "1. Basic Facts" among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. 1) The fact that the cattle shed operated by the Defendants is the stable operated by the Defendants is as seen earlier. In full view of the statements in Gap evidence 6-1 and 3, the witness testimony and arguments in the first instance trial, and the whole purport of the testimony and arguments in the court of first instance, ① it is necessary to set back the oil box in the event of transmitting a baby, which may be cut off upon the sprinking of the sprinks or hand, ② If the sprinks are going to the sprinks during the fixed work, ② if the sprinks are going to the sprinks, the sprinks may go to the sprinks, and the sprinks may go to the sprinks, and ③ after the death of the deceased, the sprinks can be found to have been supplied with the sprinks of this case as the sprinks of this case at the time of the investigation by the investigation agency on December 15, 2010.

B. The following circumstances revealed by each of the above facts, i.e., (i) the ASEAN LAG, the president of the feed supplier, who is not the Defendants, spent the expenses. However, the ASEAN itself was conducted at the request of the Defendants, and it was conducted for the Defendants, who are the owners of the instant livestock shed and the dispatching land. As such, the overall management entity of the ASEAN can be deemed the Defendants, and (ii) the ASEAN’s management entity can be deemed the Defendants.