The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant had been able to teach with the victim C for a period of two years prior to the facts charged, but he was demanded by the victim to hedge, and the victim demanded that the parent of the Defendant and the Internet meeting on smartphone, which is the Internet meeting on smartphones, to go to the victim.

1. On October 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the Franchis shop located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, on the ground that the victim demanded continuous hedging without going to death; (b) on the ground that “When filing a complaint, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine on the ground that the complaint was a fine, and was sentenced to a fine on the ground that she did not go to a fine; and (c) her mother and D group within one month, who did not go to death; (d) her mother and D group. Unless there was a true intention, the Defendant threatened the victim as if he would inflict any harm on the body or life of the victim.”

2. Around November 12, 2014, the Defendant sought at the public service center of the Jinhae-gu Office, the workplace of the victim located in the Jinhae-gu G, Changwon-si, the Defendant threatened the victim as if he would inflict harm on the victim’s body or life after 10 days from the date of 10 days, stating, “The victim knew that he/she became aware of it, but he/she was aware of it for 10 days.”

3. 피고인은 2014. 11. 17.경 위 진해구청 민원실에서, 피해자에게 “나는 이미 준비 다 됐어, 한 달 시간 준 거 당신한테도 준비줬지만 나도 준비하고 있었어, 당신 죽인다고 협박만 한다고 하는데 그런 말 왜 하게 만드는 거요 내가 찾아온 게 마지막입니다. 분명히 5일까기 기다립니다. 그 이후는 내가 어떻게 하는가 한번 보이소, 다음에 죽을 준비 다 해놨으니까”라고 말하여 5일 후 피해자의 신체나 생명에 위해를 가할 것처럼 피해자를 협박하였다.

4. On November 21, 2014, the Defendant called the victim at around 09:07, and made it known to the victim that the Defendant affixed a seal, i.e., a type of getable sain and a mixed.