logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.12 2017가단68687
배당이의
Text

1. It was drawn up by the said court on December 19, 2017 with respect to the auction case of the status of real estate in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch F.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims against Defendant B: To be as shown in the attached Form;

Applicable provisions: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Service by Public Notice)

2. A summary of the claim against Defendant C, D, and E: as shown in the grounds for the claim in the attached Form.

Provided: The burden of proving the grounds for objection to a distribution in a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution is also in accordance with the principle of distribution of the burden of proof in general civil procedure. Therefore, in the event that the plaintiff claims that the defendant's claim has not been constituted, the defendant is liable to prove the facts of the cause of the claim, and in the event that the plaintiff claims that the claim is null and void as a false declaration of prior agreement or extinguished

(대법원 2007. 7. 12. 선고 2005다39617 판결 등 참조). 에 따라 살피건대, 을나 1∽5호증, 을다 1∽10호증, 을라 1∽5호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 증인 G의 증언내용에 비추어 볼 때, 갑 3∽7호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재 또는 원고 주장 사정만으로는 피고들이 이 사건 건물의 가장임차인이라거나 소액임차인제도를 악용하였다고 인정하기 부족하고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is accepted on the ground of the reasons, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C, D, and E is dismissed on the ground of all of the reasons.

arrow