Acquittal of the accused shall be acquitted.

1. On February 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a top door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door from the victim’s cash door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, in order to prevent the victim’s cash up to 3,000 won, which is owned by the victim.

2. According to the records, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by the Incheon District Court on May 15, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 28th of the same month, and the criminal facts of the above final judgment can be recognized as a theft by: “The Defendant, at around 03:00 on April 10, 2013, entered into the open door door of the victim I who was parked in the vicinity of the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, by taking out KRW 30,00, a cash owned by the victim who was kept in custody at the front of the driver’s seat and the chief of the department; and around 03:50 on the same day, at around 03:50, at the 4-dong parking lot of Seo-gu, Incheon, by taking the front door door of the victim’s Mabter freight owned by the victim, and at least 250,00 property.”

According to the above facts of recognition, the facts charged in this case, which became final and conclusive, and committed prior to the pronouncement of the judgment, shall be deemed to have been committed by the Defendant through the realization of the theft habits, in light of the means and methods of the crime, the period of the crime, and the criminal records of this case committed prior to the pronouncement of the judgment. Thus, the facts charged in this case, which had been final and conclusive, are the crimes of larceny and the facts charged prior