logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2014.07.18 2014고단577
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, with the intention of receiving KRW 10 million in return for a false marriage report, Defendant A, with the intention of receiving KRW 10 million in return for the false marriage report around December 2010. Defendant B, with the intention of extending the period of stay in Korea, did not intend to establish a marital relationship with the intention of setting up a false marital relationship.

1. On March 3, 201, Defendant A entered in the public electromagnetic records, etc., in relation to the civil petition service division for the members of the Gu Office located in 685 as the center of the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the fact was prepared a marriage registration statement and submitted it to the public official of the Gu office who was unable to identify the name as if he had been married normally even though he had no intention to

Accordingly, public officials in charge of the above family register who knew of such circumstances were computerized into the actual marriage of the defendants A in the family relation register of the defendants.

As a result, the Defendants made a false report to the public official to record false facts in the same electronic records register as the original of the authentic deed.

2. The Defendants, at around that time, exercised the above-mentioned family relation register by having the above-mentioned family relation register kept at the managing body of the members.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the marriage relation certificate and the marriage registration law;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 228 (1), 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of punishment, and Articles 229, 228 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not more than seven years and not more than six months;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Determination of types: Type 1, such as crime of official documents, fabrication, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc. and type;

(b) General talented persons:

arrow