logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.09 2014고정278
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On November 29, 2013, the Defendant driving a B rocketing taxi on November 29, 2013, and proceeding two lanes in front C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in front of C in order to proceed to the opposite line.

At the time, the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to make a U.S. internship at the point where the U.S. is permitted.

Nevertheless, the front part of the PEIM110 Otoba, which was proceeding in the opposite direction due to the negligence of the central line, was conflicted with the front part of the PEIM110 Oba on the right side of the cab.

Therefore, the victim suffered the injury such as "satisfe salt", which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. An accident-related photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a case where the defendant caused a traffic accident accompanied by an injury by the defendant by breaking the central line. In light of the unfavorable circumstances such as the degree of injury of the victim, etc., the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and the victim is not willing to be punished by the defendant, the vehicle of the defendant is affiliated with the Financial Cooperative, the defendant is affiliated with the Financial Cooperative, and the defendant is a person with disabilities of class 3 with disabilities of class 3 in consideration of favorable circumstances such as ordinary recipients, and all of the sentencing conditions

arrow