logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.08.29 2019고단351
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 교통사고처리특례법위반(치상) 피고인은 B 포르테 쿱 승용차의 운전업무에 종사하는 사람이다.

On August 4, 2018, the Defendant was driving the said car on the 17:33rd day, and the Defendant was driving at a speed of approximately 100 km/h of the 181.8km of the west Coastal Highway located in Boncheon-Eup Sho-si, and the two-lanes of the 181.8km of the west Coastal Highway from Seoul bank to the chilling area. On the other hand, the Defendant did not look away from the road due to occupational negligence and did not look away from the road, and the fire was caused because the steel area was facing the fuel tank of the vehicle.

After all, the Defendant suffered chloat images, such as face-to-face images and arms 2 degrees in need of approximately 8 weeks of treatment to the victim C (V, 18 years of age) who was on the job as above, and face pictures, such as face-to-face images, which require approximately 3 weeks of treatment to the same victim D (V, 15 years of age).

2. 자동차손해배상보장법위반 피고인은 B 포르테 쿱 승용차의 보유자이다.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said car which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place mentioned in the above Paragraph 1.

[The defendant and his defense counsel did not discover that there was no fault of force majeure. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant was placed in the front section of the road among the two-lanes of the defendant's driving, and the accident of this case occurred because the defendant was reversely, and the accident of this case occurred. At the time of the accident, it seems that there was no circumstance that the defendant could not discover the front section of this case at August 1, 200, and that it was difficult to conduct the order of damage to the front section, and that the violation of duty at the front section is sufficiently recognized.]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Reporting on investigation ( listening to statements concerning steel materials and reporting thereon);

1. The actual condition survey report, the mandatory insurance policy council, and

arrow