1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of this court concerning this case is as follows. Thus, this court's explanation is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following cases. Thus, this court's explanation is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

[Attachment] The part of [Public 01.26], [Public 22], [limited] joint ownership] in [Attachment] is as follows.]

Public 01.26 Remuneration Costs – - 10,08,241- - Important Remuneration Costs, such as the occurrence of a blind spot in the CCTV of underground parking lots, 10,008,241- - - 1,74,898- - - 8,540,4235,423,678, 678, 127,049,9294,95,2326,87,297, 987,297,44 of the table, as follows:

The repair expenses for common areas (public works, landscaping, underground parking lots, etc.) used jointly with the lessee households in this case for the purpose of common areas (public works, landscaping, and underground parking lots) used for the purpose of common areas (public works, etc.) for the purpose of common areas (public works, landscaping, underground parking lots, etc.) for the 10-year 5-year 5-year 10-year 540, 4235, 342, 678 127,049, 929, 929, 955, 2326, 87, 298, 97, 943, 398, 781, 680, 576, were calculated by applying 58.43%, which is the total floor area ratio of the unit unit of this case and the lessee households in this case.

68,401,760 11,501,568 31,454,741 28,174,174,378-28,624, 624, 466 142,50,373,379, 2041, 991 87,797, 4195,224,307,407,41924,3074,412,95,2327,20,40110,567,864924,180,180,593,2767,7867,747,767,767,7686,767,767,767,767,7686,767,767,767,767,767,74,767,767,7,7167

The 1st 419,294,035,121,540,423,415,5752,287,960,042,830,564,5642,74,744,269,203,910 20,948,180, 4,612,3064, 3064, 657,6457, 645, 23062,306, 2306, 222,682,32,328,705, 7056, 1389, 889, 135, 1365, 1375, 1375, 1975,745,7445,645, 197