logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.08.10 2018고단438
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On September 18, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million as a result of interference with the performance of official duties in the branch court of the Gwangju District Court, and on November 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for four months due to the crime of injury, etc. in the branch court of the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 22, 2014. However, on April 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of interference with the performance of official duties committed during the said suspended sentence, and on May 2, 2016, the said judgment became void as a result of the final and conclusive judgment, and the execution of each of the above suspended sentence was terminated on July 14, 2017.

[2018 Highest 438] The Defendant was in the police box of the wooden Police Station D in C around April 20, 2018, and was in the “E” above.

In order to make a statement on the F’s assault case, the F police box was found to be the above F F and the above F, and, under the influence of alcohol, took a bath to the above F and take a bath to the civil petitioner, etc., and was solicited by G to return home from the police officer assigned to the police box to the above G by having the police officer assigned to the police box “I am out of the time spaws, spaws, spaws, spaws, and assault the above G by taking the trees of the above G by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

[2018 J. 534] On June 19, 2018, the Defendant expressed that he was able to return home from the police officer J affiliated with the 112 police box called “I” in front of the 19:25 p.m. at H on the 19:19:25, and expressed that he was able to “I” and “I do not know the sp. sp. sp. sp. sp. sp. sp. sp. sp. sp.s. sp.s. sp.s. sp.s. s.s.s. on the floor of the sp. sp.s., the Defendant

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Records】

1. Written inquiry about criminal history, etc.;

1. Ten copies of the investigation report (a confirmation of the same record of the suspect and a copy of the relevant decision), the sentence of the judgment, and the investigation report (the release of the suspect related to a repeated crime).

arrow