beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On July 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 14, 2016.
[The premise of perjury] The defendant in collusion with C, and around November 15, 2012, at the office of the defendant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the defendant and C did not have obtained the approval of custody of KRW 100 billion, and even if he was unable to obtain the approval of custody, he did not have the intent or ability to lend KRW 100 billion to the victim E even if he was unable to obtain the approval of custody, the defendant confirmed that "the foreign company would lend KRW 100 billion to C" to the victim, and the defendant should promptly take Sck as soon as possible before the cancellation of the loan, and the deposit cost is KRW 3 billion.5 billion, the deposit cost is KRW 100,000,000 per month with the interest of KRW 3 billion,000,000 per month to the five copies per month.
“A false statement is made to the effect that “A victim has obtained the approval from a foreign company to bring in foreign capital of KRW 100 billion,” and C continues to lend money to the victim, which is the same as a fine and the president of the Ethon was paid late. As such, C would first use money and lend money to the victim, such as the cost of business promotion, etc.
“Falsely speaking, the Defendant was indicted on charges of deceiving KRW 212,60,000 from the date of damage to January 18, 2013, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and one year for C, respectively.
[Specific criminal facts] Around June 17, 2015, the Defendant is present at the court of the Seoul Central District Court 526, which was located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, 157, as a witness of the above fraud case with respect to Defendant C, who was judged as an accomplice of the instant perjury case, with C, and the litigation procedure is separated.