Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes set forth in Section 1, 3, and 4 of the Decision, 2 months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On September 14, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for any crime of false entry into public electromagnetic records, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on September 25, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 25, 201. On September 6, 2011, the Daegu District Court sentenced eight months to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc., and was released on January 22, 2012 while serving in the Daegu District Court on September 6, 201, but the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 16, 2012, and the said suspended sentence becomes void, and thus, the said suspended sentence is currently being executed (scheduled to be terminated on January 19, 2013)

Defendant

B On September 6, 2011, the Daegu District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one year due to the crime of false entry into public electromagnetic records, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 13th of the same month.

1. "2012 Highest 352" (Defendants);

A. Co-defendants received approximately 10 million won per head from Vietnam women who want to enter the Republic of Korea in return, and intended to make a disguised marriage between Vietnam women and domestic men, with telephone counseling from the domestic men who want to enter the Republic of Korea who want to enter the Republic of Korea, and conspired to receive documents necessary for the report of marriage and to make a report of marriage.

around May 20, 201, the Defendants and D indicated their names in the husband column of the marriage report form “D”, “B”, “F”, “G”, “G”, and “Y-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the place of registration” in the name column of the husband, “E”, “I”, “E”, “E” on the date of birth, the place of registration, address Vietnam”, etc., and submitted to the public official in charge of the name in charge of the family relation registration information processing system, and made the entry into the said D and E to the above public official in charge of the family relation registration information processing system, as if they had no intention to marry, although they had no intention to marry.

Defendants and J have no intention to marry between J and Vietnam, who is the same day of day.