logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.04.05 2014가합1107
하자보수금 등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 953,955,106 among the Plaintiff and KRW 101,00,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 739,382,210 from March 19, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The Plaintiff is militaryposi A Apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) The Defendant is a business proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment, and the Intervenor’s Intervenor was the company that constructed the instant apartment. The Defendant constructed the instant apartment. The Defendant was the company that built the instant apartment.

B. A pre-use inspection and the occupancy of the instant apartment was conducted on July 2, 2010, and the occupancy was conducted around that time.

C. 1) The occurrence of defects and the claim for repair of the apartment in this case did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing while constructing the apartment in this case, or changed the part to be constructed differently from the defective construction or design drawing, thereby causing a defect such as rupture and water leakage in the section for common use and the section for exclusive use of the apartment in this case. 2) The Plaintiff requested the repair of defects to the Defendant at the request of the occupants or sectional owners of the apartment in this case, but still, the apartment in this case still remains a defect, such as the defect in the item in the separate section for common use and the item in the separate section for exclusive use of attached Table 2 in the defect repair sum table (Provided, That the items in the non-supture of each aggregate sheet are excluded from

1) The Plaintiff shall transfer the right to claim damages in lieu of the repair of defects and notify 376 households (hereinafter “transfer household of this case”) excluding 13 households indicated as the expenses for repairing the defects of the portion of exclusive ownership of the household that is not attached Form 3 among the total 389 households of the apartment

(2) Around that time, the Defendant received a claim for damages in lieu of defect repair in relation to the apartment of this case against the Defendant, and notified the Defendant of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of

arrow