(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.24 2016가합79751

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.03.24 2016가합79751

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiffs' primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 24, 2016, the Plaintiffs entered into a contract with the Defendant to purchase KRW 620,000,000 (hereinafter “instant site”) out of KRW 620,00 in price, of KRW 2,479,000,000,00,000 in the wife E, 2,479,000 square meters in the Defendant’s wife population, F field 149,000 square meters in G field 472 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant land”), H 618 square meters in H, and J 2,479, in the amount of KRW 620,00,00 in the price (hereinafter “instant contract”). On the date of the contract, the Plaintiffs paid the Defendant the down payment amount of KRW 60,000,000 on the day of the contract.

B. At the time of the instant sales contract with the Defendant, the Plaintiffs agreed on the following special agreements:

Matters of special agreement

1. Development activities and building permits shall be transferred to a purchaser by acquiring them in the future of the seller;

2. The balance shall be paid after the completion of the construction permit.

(b)

5.The authorization and permission in respect of this property shall be granted by the seller and the buyer shall pay the costs of the licence.

6. All contracts at the time of development activities and construction non-permission shall be null and void at source and shall be terminated without any damage between both parties;

(A) 12. Construction and development documents shall be prepared within seven days after the contract is made.

(Road) (including Roads) 14. 14. Do-type 14. Do-type 1. Do-type 1. Do-type 20,000,000 won, 00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including the number of each branch; hereinafter the same shall apply), entry of Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The primary claim of the plaintiffs asserted that the plaintiff paid the down payment to the defendant, and requested a certified architect office to conduct related affairs, such as permission for development of each of the lands of this case, and the execution of the contract of this case was commenced. However, the defendant performs its duty under the contract of this case

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2017.05.19 2016가합58580

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.08.12 2015가단82484

-부산지방법원 2014.04.16 2013가합18694

-대전지방법원 2019.10.23 2018가합108463

-수원지방법원안양지원 2020.12.02 2019가단124039