1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, given that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court

2. Parts used or added;

A. The 8th 10 to 15th 15th 10 of the judgment of the first instance.

[Attachment] The evidence No. 3 (Resale Guide) delivered by the Defendants to the Plaintiffs at the time of sale indicated “the completion of permission for development of a pre-sale site” as the characteristic of Q. However, in light of the fact that the first-sale lot is indicated as 33 parcels and the second-sale lot as 31 parcels in the evidence No. 2 (part of the web-site), the meaning of the “land” explained by the Defendants to the Plaintiffs at the time of sale is deemed to refer to the part of exclusive ownership, and it is difficult to view that the forest of this case includes the forest of this case,

B. The judgment of the court of first instance stated that “the indication was made, or the above mistake was caused by the Defendants’ deception, or was caused by the Defendants.”

C. At the 10th end of the first instance judgment, “In addition, it is difficult to view that partial revocation is possible, as it is difficult to recognize the assumptive intent of the parties (in particular, the Defendants) who intend to maintain the remaining parts of the land subject to each of the instant sales contracts, other than the instant woodland, from the land subject to each of the instant sales contracts (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Da21509, Sept. 10, 2002).

3. In conclusion, each of the instant claims against the Defendants against the Defendants should be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and each of the plaintiffs' appeals is dismissed as it is without merit.