logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.11.27 2014고단987
국민체육진흥법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Criminal facts

No person, other than the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation or an entrusted business entity, shall issue sports betting tickets or similar things (including the issuance thereof by means of information and communications networks) and provide property or financial benefits (hereinafter referred to as "similar act") to persons who win at the betting results, and no person shall do gambling using similar acts.

On December 26, 2011, the Defendant sent 50,000 won to a new bank account (Account Number: I) of the Defendant’s foreign exchange bank account (Account Number: 50,000 won, and deposited 50,000 won in charge of the corresponding game money, which predicted “F” or “acquisition store” of the sports game, such as a stable, which was opened at home or abroad, and was exchanged for dividends calculated by multiplying the dividend rate by the amount of distribution, if the result is met, it shall be operated in such a way that the amount of dividends is lost). The Defendant deposited 50,00 won from the Defendant’s foreign exchange bank account (Account Number:H) to the Defendant’s foreign exchange bank account, and deposited 50,000 won in charge of the corresponding game money, which was recorded on the total amount of KRW 40,000,000 from the time of hosting to December 2, 2014, and deposited 1964,1969888.

Accordingly, the defendant was stuffed by using similar acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen by opening the details of account transactions and cutting down a gambling site;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 48 subparagraph 1 and 26 (1) of the former National Sports Promotion Act (Amended by Act No. 12348, Jan. 28, 2014);

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the provisional payment order is that the defendant recognizes the facts charged in the instant case as a substitute and reflects it.

arrow