beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, at around April 7, 2017, issued D Public Notice No. 402 in Jinju-si C, around 21:49, using its own computers, subject to the title “F” on Ninber Bro (E).
H The birth of the denying JC is the origin of his or her father, together with his or her father's study abroad and double nationality.
H The I’s subordinate, I’s home, even if he sent out his study to the Republic of Korea.
Franchising the monthly tax of 6 million won Haba.
H When a candidate establishes an educational policy, it is necessary to see the situation that is contradictory to the phrase “this-grade society is not defined and has no future,” which read “the substitute forest of the father is more severe through education”, and that “this-grade society is not defined and not future.”
It is necessary to see that the substitute forest of the division is influent through education, but it is not bad, but influent, it is doubtful that it is different. K 100 million controversy.
I I have a public school and public schools do not receive students.
If only the domicile is registered, the entrance needs to be possible.
H The reason why the denial of candidates was going to study in the U.S. in 2002, so if LC, a dependent in 1997, when he did not have any accompanying visa, he must have the U.S. citizenship if he attends a public school.
Ultimately, “H denial is a suspicion that it may result in the original childbirth.”
Not until the delivery of the original family, the method of illegal admission was left.
either party has been in existence;
The images of H conflict with the images of H
If the U.S. citizen is a U.S. citizen, it is necessary to waive the Korean nationality. If it is true, it is sufficient to see that the presidential consciousness is a citizen of the U.S. who is a citizen of the U.S. and most academic colons in the U.
The facts charged are described as follows: (a) on the same day, the Defendant posted a notice of the title “candidate” on the same day, but this is directly different from the facts charged in this case.