1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant corrected in the trial are all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit in the trial.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 1962, the Defendant: (a) on the part of the Plaintiff A and the copy of the Plaintiff B’s contribution (hereinafter “the deceased”); (b) on the part of the Plaintiff C (hereinafter “the deceased”); (c) on November 1, 1905, upon writing, inserting, inserting, inserting, and inserting, the essayed E-Related Act in the D Newspaper; (d) on May 1, 1906, the Defendant organized the H organization; (c) thereafter, the Defendant was satisfed in the writing enlightenment; (d) on March 1, 1962, the Plaintiff was satisfy in the 1st of the International Newspapers; (e) on the part of the President of the K Association; and (e) on the part of the President of the K Association, the Defendant was an executive officer of the K Association and contributed to an independent movement, such as cultivating the independence thought.

The Order of Merit for National Foundation was awarded by the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs. (b) At that time, the above contents are also recorded in the “OOO’s Order of Merit for National Foundation.” In particular, as to the horse year of the deceased, “M was put in the country on 1910, the Deceased was laid off by inserting Japan in M M, which led to the abolition of L, and the complete deprivation of the stage of its activities, which led to the chip to O after October 2, 1920.

c. The Intervenor recorded the record as “the Minister of the Interior and Safety on November 19, 2010.” The Intervenor presented to the Minister of the Interior and Safety a proposal on the cancellation of a decoration to the President of the Republic of Korea on the ground that he/she is pro-Japanese, such as the Deceased’s appointment as a member of the National Assembly from November 19, 2013 to 1918, and that there is pro-Japanese, such as appointment of P promoters and executive secretary, etc. on April 6, 1914, and thus, constitutes “the case where there is a false meritorious deed” under Article 8(1)1 of the Awards and Decorations Act, and requested the Minister of the Interior and Safety to submit a proposal on the cancellation of a decoration to the President of the National Council. The agenda was subject to a resolution of the State Council on April 5, 201, and the Defendant made a resolution on the cancellation of decoration to the Intervenor on April 6, 2011.