1. The main part of the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim is dismissed.

3...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s father B (hereinafter “the father”) participated in the establishment of the Hansung Temporary Government in 1919, and was engaged in activities as a staff member of the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, a member of Gangwon-do, and a local special staff member from 1919 to 1920, and was sentenced to three years due to the activities of the Youth Diplomatic Association in 1920.

“Along with the recognition of merit, the Intervenor was awarded the independence of the Order of Merit on December 13, 1977. B. The Intervenor of the Defendant Litigation (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) requested the Minister of the Interior and Safety to submit a proposal on the cancellation of decoration on the ground that the Defendant’s friendship was confirmed by the President of the Interior and Safety on the ground that it constitutes “the case where it is found that the meritorious deed was false,” as stipulated in Article 8(1)1 of the former Awards and Decorations Act (amended by Act No. 10985, Aug. 4, 2011; hereinafter “Reward and Decoration Act”) and the Minister of the Interior and Safety presented a proposal on the cancellation of decoration to the State Council on December 21, 2010, on the ground that the proposal was presented on December 21, 2010 to the Minister of the Interior and Safety, and the Defendant’s revocation of decoration by the State Council on April 1, 2015.

C. On April 6, 2011, the Minister of the Interior and Safety notified the intervenors to the effect that “The participants informed that the case requesting the revocation of a decoration for the person of distinguished service to the independence and that the person subject to the revocation of decoration is confirmed as indicated in the State Council’s resolution and the Defendant’s re-abstinence (19 persons, such as the deceased, etc.).” The Minister collected all orders and related goods granted in relation thereto pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Awards and Decorations Act and taken measures to redeem them.”

On April 19, 2011, the Intervenor issued a notice to the Plaintiff to the effect that “the deceased was able to have performed an independence movement during the Japanese colonial period, but the deceased’s friendly activities, such as support activities for the Japanese War, etc., comprehensively taken into account, and revoked the decoration of the persons of distinguished services to the national independence to the deceased (hereinafter “instant notice”).

[Grounds for recognition] Class A, Nos. 1, 2, and B