logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2017.01.11 2016고합17
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum term of October or for a short term of eight months at the Busan District Court on February 17, 1996; imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of robbery at the Changwon District Court on April 24, 1998; imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Daegu District Court on June 26, 2003; imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Daegu District Court on December 30, 2004; imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Daegu District Court on November 28, 2007; and imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Daegu District Court on March 16, 2007 (Aggravated Punishment, etc.).

【2016 Gohap 17】

1. On August 27, 2016, the Defendant invadedd the victim’s residence by entering the crime prevention window, which was located in the inner window, as his/her hand, in the victim D’s residence located in the Chungcheongbuk-gun C around 11:25 on August 27, 2016, in order to steal the property, and invaded the victim’s residence.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

A. On August 19, 2016, the Defendant discovered KRW 200,000,000 in cash owned by the victim E before the date of cash withdrawal No. 35, 13, Jinju Livestock Co., Ltd., located at 19:20, Jinju-ro, Jin-si, 19:20 on August 19, 2016, and stolen it thereafter.

B. On August 27, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime, as set forth in paragraph 1, was aware of the victim D’s gathering inside the wall, and was influence of the article to be stolen, and the Defendant was influent with the fluence of the lock box or the cremation box, and the Defendant was influence of the article to be stolen, and the victim opened the front door and entered.

arrow