Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 27, 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim D’s E-bababa in front of “C” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, by putting off the victim D’s E-bababa, which was set up in front of “C” located in “C” in Gangnam-gu, Seoul on several occasions and destroying Hands and
Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the above Orala to the extent that the repair cost was not awarded.
2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time and place as the preceding paragraph, and was arrested in the act of committing the act of committing the crime on the same ground, and was born to the back seat of Franchisa patrol car of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station.
When the defendant saw, frightened, and frightened from several times, he destroyed plastic structures of the above back of the next back.
As above, the Defendant damaged the car so that the repair cost of 871,178 won is damaged.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to D by the police;
1. A written statement of G and D;
1. Written estimate for repair of patrols;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for each crime;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. In full view of all the circumstances, such as the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order and the fact that each of the crimes of this case was committed without being aware of the fact that the defendant was committed during the repeated crime period, the defendant did not recover damage, and the defendant was committed at the time of committing a crime, there are no criminal records of the same kind, circumstances favorable to the beneficiary of basic living security, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, circumstance, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and other circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and records