A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Criminal facts

On December 22, 2014, the Defendant drafted a complaint against D at the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office of Building.

The contents of the complaint include: (a) “Defendant C” written a written confirmation on December 18, 2013, stating that “C Building D” was “A” and written at will to be a certified one; and (b) submitted the said document to the court to punish the forgery of the private document and the exercise of the investigation document; and (c) the Defendant voluntarily signed the written confirmation around December 18, 2013.”

Nevertheless, on December 22, 2014, the defendant submitted a written complaint to the police officer in charge in the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public service center of the Yangcheon Police Station.

Accordingly, the defendant had the above D without the purpose of having the D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Details of the sound recording file which is verified after reproduction in this Act;

1. A copy of a certificate and a letter of request for notarial acts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to analysis and reporting of mobile phone recording files;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 156 of the relevant Article of the Criminal Code for criminal facts [the scope of recommendations] [the grounds for sentencing] of Article 156 of the relevant Article of the Criminal Code for the crime [the grounds for sentencing No. 1] [the person who is subject to special sentencing]: six months to two years [the person who is subject to special sentencing]]] [the decision of sentence] denies the defendant's criminal act, but the defendant denies his/her criminal act, but the grounds for supporting his/her act are very rare, there is a high

On the other hand, the defendant seems to not have a good health condition due to the age of 80 before and after the age of 80.

In addition to these circumstances, the sentence was determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the proceedings of the instant case, including the criminal records of the Defendant and the circumstances after the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.