logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.11.22 2017구단20006
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 22, 2016, the Plaintiff, as the business owner of B, filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) around July 11, 2016; (b) around July 8, 2016, the Plaintiff was faced with the right shoulder on the door mold from among the offices of Busan-gu C and 302, Busan-gu, Busan-do, and the third floor 302, which were outside for the purpose of the judgment of the jury (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (c) caused the instant accident to the right shoulder (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. On October 5, 2016, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application on the ground that the causal relationship between the instant upper branch and the instant accident is not recognized.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury or disease of this case is recognized as causation caused by the accident of this case, and thus, the instant disposition that was otherwise determined is unlawful.

B. Medical opinion 1) At least 90 degrees of 90 degrees of pain increase and movement restrictions on the right side of Plaintiff JI's (D Hospital), and the revolving of the upper right side of the name of the disease (M751A) in view of the opinion of the view of the rupture, there is a combination of existing diseases (M751A) and external wounds (S4600). The rupture due to the instant accident and external wounds (S4600) of the Defendant's advisory opinion was partially related to the Defendant's rupture on July 25, 2016 and on August 2, 2016, the rupture of extreme time is confirmed according to the opinion of the rupture, and the rupture of rupture of the court is not related to the rupture of this case's rupture, but all of the appraisal of the rupture or rupture of the rupture of this case's rupture.

arrow