A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The “E company” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City D entered into a contract with the F Gu office for the collection and transportation of food wastes, collected food wastes on a collection container by attaching a certificate of confirmation of payment for domestic use at a general home in Seoul, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M, and transporting them to the final disposal agency. The Defendant worked as the manager in E and performed duties such as field management.

In the case of E, only food wastes discharged from ordinary homes in the area where the Defendant entered into an agency contract as above can be collected and transported, and food wastes discharged out of the area where the Defendant entered into an agency contract, such as large restaurants, cannot be collected and transported. However, the Defendant entered into a false entrustment contract with a food waste-generating business site in the name of “N company”, a comprehensive food waste recycling business entity, using a food waste entrustment contract under the name of “N company,” and received the commission fee directly and received the commission fee, and food wastes were disposed of by mixing with food wastes collected and collected by the vehicle for collection and transportation of E.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On May 25, 2015, the Defendant involved in the crime of “P set forth a copy of the food waste recycling consignment contract under the name of “N company” that was reproduced and possessed by an employee in the name in the name of “P set forth above at Q in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul.” As such, the Defendant stated the said employee as “300,000 won per month” in the contract term column, “P, Dobong-gu Seoul, Q, R, and S” in the collection fee column, and “P, Dobong-gu, Seoul, Q, and Q, R, and S” in the consignment column.

The Defendant continued to write “T, N, O, Gyeonggi-do Yang-si U,” in the consignment column using a verification-type pen, and prepares it as such.