1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiff A's claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasons for the finding of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case are partly amended as stated in Paragraph 2. The plaintiffs added the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case, and as such, it is identical to the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of the new or new argument, as stated in Paragraph 3. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

2. The amended part Nos. 3 and 2 and 3 of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 2nd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the "the 3rd part of the operation occurred while in operation

The 6th parallels No. 11-14 shall be followed as follows.

“B. Therefore, the Defendants are jointly liable to pay the Plaintiff KRW 547,904,767 in total for damages (i.e., KRW 51,750,491 in total) (i.e., KRW 57,928,082 in total for future treatment costs of KRW 16,827,965 in support expenses of KRW 1,162,070 in nursing expenses of KRW 360,236,159 in compensation amount of KRW 60,000 in compensation amount of KRW 60,000 in compensation amount of KRW 10,000 in compensation amount of KRW 10,00 in compensation amount of KRW 10,50 in compensation amount of KRW 50 in compensation amount of KRW 51,91 in compensation amount of KRW 57,928,082 in compensation amount of KRW 16,82 in consideration of evidence No. 5-10,000 in consideration of evidence No. 2-2, No. 28-A.

After September 21, 2013, the term "Plaintiff A and C" in the second sentence shall be added and the term "after explanation" in the fifth sentence shall be added.

The first 3-4 of the 11th 2th 1st am " was administered during the operation" means "the scam and the scamscams were found during the operation and administered 1,000 g of scamscams as beercamscamscamscams." The 6th amcamscams "Valscamscamscamscamscam (Valscam, euver)", and the 20th amcams "writtenscamscamsp. 6, Eul, and Eul evidence 8-2" respectively.

Defendant E, “Defendant E,” in Part 12, is a doctor, Q, nurse R and S at the time of the Plaintiff’s transfer to the medical personnel of G Hospital at the time of the Plaintiff’s transfer.