1. The defendant paid 3.3. the floor of the underground parking lot for the Asan City D apartment and the defect repair in the eight-dong underground set.

(b) It seems that the method of waterproofing underground rooms, etc. should be applied, and waterproofing, reinforcement, and installation of drainage and drainage facilities of apartment buildings to be constructed at a place with a high level of groundwater;

1. The background and direction-setting background of the promotion - The direction-setting defect in order to prepare a plan to improve the basic performance of the defendant's apartment complex based on the resolution of problems caused by the recent five major issues, such as lighting, waterproofing, and drawing of a group in Asan, shall be divided into design defects and construction defects, and the design shall be focused on the resolution, thereby promoting the enhancement of housing quality through minimizing defects in a short period;

4. Measures for each type of defect (asye) - water leakage causes - water leakage in underground parking lots: Non-construction volume of underground room such as underground parking lots - water leakage volume: Measures by reason of waterproof omission - double structure application to the floor and outer wall: double wall installation, drainage board installation - application of waterproof construction method to the floor and outer wall of the underground room where flood control has been omitted - installation of waterproof reinforcement and drainage facilities where groundwater level is high - request for cooperation in the housing business related to 2 housing projects -- 897 ( March 6, 2012) and institutional improvement - The defendant did not have a serious problem because water leakage defects, such as underground parking lots, etc., other than the apartment of this case and the building constructed by the plaintiff from among the apartment of this case where the defendant ordered the construction work, other apartment of this case and the building of the building of this case, other than the building of the building of this case, the defect in this case does not constitute a design defect, but the defect in the construction of the plaintiff.

However, the above circumstances alone are not sufficient to readily conclude that the defect in this case constitutes the plaintiff's construction defect, and in the case of the apartment in this case, the actual groundwater level of the lower part was above the design of the groundwater level, so the defect in this case occurred, and in the case of the apartment in which the lower part of the apartment does not win the groundwater level on the design of the lower part of the apartment, there is no waterproof design on the basic concrete.