logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.24 2016누66720
취득세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the fourth page 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “the testimony of the witness A of the court of first instance” added to “the testimony of the witness A of the court of first instance” is difficult to see “the testimony of the court of first instance” as follows, and it is insufficient to recognize it only by the descriptions of evidence A 16 to 21.

From the fourth side of the judgment of the first instance court, the body of the outer wall of the entrance of the instant building is as follows. On the top of the outer wall of the building of this case, the signboards indicated as “human resources development center and industry-academic cooperation center” are attached, and on the wall of the sixth floor of the instant building, the signboards stating the contents of the building extended with the government subsidy for human resources development.

On the fifth 5th th th th 5th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st

arrow