logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.10 2016누53830
장기요양급여비용환수처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 4 of the first instance court's decision No. 4, 3-20, "B", "B", and the first instance court's decision No. 4, 2, 3-19, were prepared by mistake or coercion with each of the descriptions or sound described in the second instance court's judgment No. 4-60, as follows:

It is insufficient to recognize that the statements have not been made by the persons who have made a statement in the written answer to the ship.

The following is added to the content No. 17 of the 5 table of the judgment of the court of first instance (the beneficiary AH) 2: Provided, That on June 29, 2014, the content of the 270 consecutive visit medical care benefits provided in excess of the standard under Article 19(4) of the Notice on the Standards for the Provision of Long-Term Care Benefits and the Methods for Calculating Expenses for Long-Term Care Benefits, etc., the part provided in the 5 table of the judgment of the court of first instance (beneficiary E) which provided for more than 270 consecutive visit medical care benefits only on the 4th day of the month, and the AJ and the plaintiff provided only bathing services for more than 1-2 hours.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow