logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.05.03 2015누69999
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the second 15th 15th 2th 15 of the judgment of the first instance is as follows; the third 4th 3rd 4 is as "hinging"; the third 8th 8 and 4th 8 are as "5 years old"; the third 9th 3rd 9 "the details of medical treatment" are as "the details of medical treatment"; and the fourth 14th 4th 4th 4th 14 "dual live live live lives" are as stated in the reasoning of the first judgment; therefore, it is identical to the entry of the first 14th 4th 14th 14th live live lives in addition to the fact that the latter is as "dual live lives", and Article 420

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on February 2, 201, even if the Plaintiff’s claim was not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s claim in the first instance trial, and all of the evidence additionally submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial were examined, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on this case is justifiable. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and therefore, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per

arrow