1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the court of first instance recognized the fact-finding and judgment as legitimate when comprehensively considering the evidence submitted in the court of first instance along with the contents of the

The reasons for this case are as follows: “damage” in the third 8th 8th of the judgment of the court of first instance is as “compensation for Damage”; “In the third 12th 12th 12th 13th 3rd 3rd 3rd 12 or 13 “Compensation for Damages equivalent to 111,867,700 won of lease deposit and royalties; “Compensation for Damages equivalent to 111,867,700 won of lease deposit; and Compensation for Damages equivalent to 111,867,700 won of damages due to interior works; “ multiple times” in the third 16th 3rd 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 5th 5th 4th 4th 4th 5.

“Ch. 7” in Part V, “F. 7,370,00,” “F. 7” is “F. 7,370,000,” “M. 9,” “M. M. & 258,000,” “M. 258,000,” “a suspended” in Part VI and third, “a suspended”, “the Defendant’s side” in Part VI and “the Defendant’s side”, “the 6th and 11st and 6th and 18th and the 7th and 8th et al. “nons” are “necessary for the operation of the Plaintiff’s restaurant.”