The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Nos. 27 through 37 of seized evidence.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Before determining the grounds for appeal by the Defendant for ex officio determination, the lower court acknowledged the casino business as a violation of the Tourism Promotion Act among the facts charged in the instant case, and deemed that there exists a relationship between the crime of gambling opening and the ordinary concurrence of the crime of gambling opening in which a public prosecution was instituted, and sentenced the Defendant to one year after having selected the punishment for a violation of the Tourism Promotion Act which is heavier than the punishment.

This is the defendant's defense counsel's assertion of the grounds for appeal after the deadline for submitting the grounds for appeal expires.

(1) A person who wishes to run casino business in the facts charged in the instant case with no permission from the Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism with the facilities and equipment prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, such as an exclusive business place, despite obtaining permission from the Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism, the Defendant, despite of the absence of permission from the Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism from July 27, 2012, up to October 19:20 of the same year, c apartment 256 Dong 1401 of Songpa-gu Seoul, to prevent noise on the floor, cryp for the purpose of preventing noise on the floor, 20 chairs for gambling, 20 chip, card, card, card, color 192, red 10,000 won, 100,000 won and 100,000 won and chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, chip, etc.