1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a school juristic person established on February 14, 200, and established and operated B University at Sungsung City.

The rate of recommendation for reduction of the admission quota: 35% (including week, week) of the admission quota of the university in 2018, the number of recommendations for reduction and the standard of recognition of performance according to the results of the university evaluation in this case: National scholarships i and II-type limited school loans: National scholarships excluding national scholarships - national scholarships - national scholarships - national scholarships - national scholarships 1 and Ⅱ-type limited school loans : loans - repayment limit after regular repayment - ordinary repayment - in accordance with the results of supplementary evaluation (implementation of supplementary evaluation in 2020) supplementary evaluation, if the main beneficiary of the project is an external institution or most of the project costs are disbursed for the operation of the program of an external institution or personal training expenses, etc., regardless of the conditions under which the government agency in charge can reduce the restriction on participation: the main beneficiary of the project; or the main beneficiary of the project in the project

B. On September 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) conducted the examination of the basic capacity of the university in 2018 for the 160 general colleges and 133 junior colleges (hereinafter “examination of the university in this case”); (b) found on September 4, 2018, that the president of the B university was implementing the following structural reform measures against B university on the ground that B university was classified as “II of the university limited to financial support,” subject to the total sum of 12 levels plus 75.633 points.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 27, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The “Guidance on Measures following the Examination of Basic Capacity of University in 2018,” which is a notice of procedural defect in the instant disposition, is not indicated with specific facts, and whether the instant disposition was taken in accordance with any applicable provision, and the result of the instant college assessment.