(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.24 2016누43482

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.24 2016누43482

최초요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this part of the grounds for appeal is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The court's explanation on this part of the plaintiff's assertion is based on the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2.

Since it is the same as the statement in the claim, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The details of the business and the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant case are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff entered the non-party company from May 2, 2010 to May 14, 201; (b) entered the non-party company on September 5, 2012 and served as the security guard of the instant apartment that is 219 households, two Dong Dong Dong-dong. The instant apartment is a form in which one security guard is in charge of the guard’s duty while serving at the beginning of the entrance.

B) The Plaintiff worked 24 hours a day as a day (06:30 to 06:30 the following day). Recess hours were three hours a week (12:0 to 13:30, 18:00 to 19:30), three hours and 30 minutes a day at night (2:0 to 04:30 on the following day or 03:0 to 06:00 to 06.00 on the following day), and 4 hours a day before and after the arrival of the instant apartment, 4 hours a day before and after July 9, 2014; 2 hours a day after the instant apartment patrol, 4 hours a day, 20 hours a day before and after the instant parking day; 4 hours a day after the instant apartment patrol, 2.0 hours a day before and after the instant parking day, 4 hours a day from the entrance of the council of occupants’ representatives, 1.5 times a day before and after the instant parking day, and 2 days a day from the instant parking day.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-행정소송법 제8조 제2항

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2017.07.11 2016구단699

-부산지방법원 2020.01.17 2019나49434

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.30 2018가단72754

-서울북부지방법원 2016.12.14 2015가단49160