1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The Plaintiff, Defendant D’s federation, 36,960,000 won, and this.

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Determination

A. In light of the following facts or circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the following facts and the scope of liability for damages (1) Nos. 7 through 10, and evidence No. 1 of this case, it is reasonable to deem that the accident of this case was caused by the concurrent negligence of Defendant C, E, and Defendant B, as joint tortfeasor, by failing to safely supervise and supervise the site, and violating the duty of safety consideration to the employees at the construction site, and by violating the duty of safety consideration to the employees at the construction site, and by violating the duty of safety consideration to the employees at the construction site. Thus, Defendant C, E, and B, as joint tortfeasor, are jointly liable for damages caused by the accident of this case.

(A) The direct cause of the instant accident is due to the damage of the instant cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s cler’s

(B) E bears the responsibility for the safety management and supervision of the overall work carried out by the instant cranes at the construction site, and in the manual of the vehicle, E prohibits the towing work on the front section of the vehicle, and despite the fact that there is any person who confirms that there is no person in the vicinity of the work area during the Crain work, E, in violation of this, ordered the instant Crain work on the front section of the vehicle.