Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C urban buses.

On October 20, 2014, the Defendant proceeded two lanes in front of the first public parking lot, which is located in the Dongpo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, at a speed of about 70km each other at a speed of 10km each hour, depending on two lanes from the entrance

At the time, the driver was under the duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely by examining well the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant is driving without neglecting to reduce speed.

The above bus was driven by the victim D (the 37 years old) who was driven by the injured party D (the 201-year old) due to the negligence near the central line while getting off the rainwater, the left side part of the EMW320i car driven by the victim F (the 45 years old) continued to take the front part of the car left side of the car driven by the above bus and got the victim D, the victim F and the victim H (the 51-year old) who was driven by the said bus to the front part of the above bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D, including four or more cages, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, such as cage cages, etc.; the injury to the victim F, such as cages, tensions, etc. requiring approximately 30 days of medical treatment; and the injury to the victim H, such as cages, tensions, etc. requiring approximately 60 days of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to I, J, and F;

1. The actual survey report and photographs concerning traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are brooms.